sharprm's avatar

sharprm

sharprm
26 Watchers1 Deviation
20.1K
Pageviews
Deviations are on the horizon
Watch sharprm to be the first to see new deviations.
Deviations are on the horizon
Watch sharprm to be the first to see new deviations.
Minami-Kousaka
RebelliousTreecko
Magicishaan
TheCH
Ravenezo
farberism
xwolftriggerx
eichwulf
3mpt1
AmberMurphy
TD-Vice
Seraphically
johnnyrocwell
Concept-ArtMasters
CarlosRubio
DaveRapoza
DevBurmak
Eidenet
reka-chan
dothaithanh
Zeronis
ZawYeMyint1
MathieuBeaulieu
xdragonflyx
yosinori
Sheridan-J
Reza-ilyasa
If a reporter knew another reporter lied, would they call them out on it? Take this story: Shapiro claims there was a Palestinian boy who knew about the 9/11 terror attacks Then a follow up by Adler confirms the story - but changes the Palestinian boy to a Pakistani boy. This change is something Shapiro whines about in a later article. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/690989/posts Israel had incentive to implicate Palestinians. America wanted to implicate Afghanistan. Is it possible Shapiro made the story up to implicate Palestinians? The follow up report was to counter to change the "facts" of the story consistent with the hijack
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
One of the comments I hid today really shows why it is a waste of time to trying to get people to understand honest and factual arguments: people are unable to honestly evaluate arguments. People tell you what you actually mean as if you are incapable of doing so yourself. Imagine if this happened in our day to day lives. "No, you actually DO want to upsize your Coke, you only said you didn't because your penis is small" People who do so are simply making up what they feel comfortable debating or devaluing, either because they lack comprehension skills, or they are dishonest. Perhaps they value divining ulterior motives too - I'm sure this pa
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
If someone said "Group X are all evil and greedy" in a truly egalitarian society, whatever you put as group X shouldn't affect how "taboo" the statement is, nor should the identity of the person who said it matter. A white person putting on black face should be no more or less offensive than a black person putting on white face, or an Indian putting on black or white face. A greek person should not be able to say 'wog' unless a non greek person can say 'wog' also. In 2006 an aboriginal girl assaulted a lady and called her a 'white slut' and was also charged under racial vilification laws in that state. Look what happens when the state(?) impl
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In

Profile Comments 127

Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
woah i'm the first one to comment in almost 3 and a half years?! WOAHHHHHHHH
I just stopped by to see what you were up to.
From a muslim site:

"I use the term Satanic Jews instead of Jews because I don't think it is fair to lump all Jews under the umbrella of being evil. There are too many good Jews who don't fit in that category and many of them lost their lives fighting against the diabolical schemes of some of their brethren."

[link]

Just a heads up for anyone who wants to know what the politically correct terms for criticism are.
What in God's name makes you think that is somehow more correct?
He's not generalizing.
Again, what in God's name makes you think that is somehow more correct?
View all replies
Since you won't answer this question in the thread you chose to name me in, I'll ask it here:

Yes or No: Do you concede racism is conceivably a mental disorder in and of itself - or one caused by some other form of mental illness (or combination of illnesses) - that you'll seek exhaustive, qualified medical diagnosis to definitively prove whether or not mental illness is a cause or contributor to your racist, antisemitic, paranoid, white-power beliefs?